Commons:Deletion requests/File:KCCS Cookie.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I am the image owner and wish to remove it. Subvertc (talk) 03:47, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. License is irrevocable and image is in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:05, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I am the administrator who kept this after a prior request. I failed to notice that there are two versions of this file. The older one has a (C) mark on it and the name of the photographer which does not match the name of the uploader's account. I request deletion of this image because I missed the (C) on the initial upload. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- Do you have a particular reason to think the account who uploaded doesn't belong to the named individual? Personally, I don't care if the file is deleted or not, but it seems to me that the best thing to do would be to confirm that instead of presuming. Now, I admit that it seems to me unlikely that this contributor and the photographer are one and the same, but given the photographer's rather substantive internet presence (and complete lack of celebrity status) it would be be very easy to get their email address and ask them.
- Of course, if there is a commons policy which addresses this particular situation and encourages the assumption that they're not the same, I am unaware of it. MjolnirPants (talk) 04:57, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- It's a case of COM:PCP "Precautionary Principle" at this point. The image contains a derivative image of a logo as well as a (C) mark on the initial version. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:47, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Okay, that works for me. It certainly seems to fall into the "...where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file..." clause. Delete it. MjolnirPants (talk) 19:18, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:34, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
