Commons:Valued image candidates

Skip to image nominations

Skip to most valued reviews

Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.

Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
replace the review parameter with

|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}

Save the page.
There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates

How to review an image

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure

On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
- If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
- If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:

You type	You get	When
`*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~`	Comment My comment. -- Example	You have a comment.
`*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~`	Info My information. -- Example	You have information.
`*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~`	Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example	You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
`*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~`	Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example	You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
`*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~`	Question My question. -- Example	You have a question.
`*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~`	Support Reason for supporting. -- Example	You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.

If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.

Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.

Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
- status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
- status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
- status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
- status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).

Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

55,306 closed valued image candidates
Closed as		Nominations
Promoted	49,724 (89.9%)
Undecided	3,090 (5.6%)
Declined	2,492 (4.5%)

New valued image nominations

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: JustEMV (talk) on 2024-06-04 22:37 (UTC)
Scope: Portrait of Zoila Aurora Cáceres Moreno
Used in: en:Aurora Cáceres, es:Aurora Cáceres, qu:Zoila Cáceres, eu:Aurora Cáceres Moreno, bn:অরোরা কাসেরেস, ar:أورورا كاسيريس
Support Best in scope. I've added Category:Images requiring restoration. --Thi (talk) 08:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 04:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-06 05:03 (UTC)
Scope: *Balcony of Hotel Le Isole* in Campo san Provolo Venice**
Is the hotel notable? Is the balcony design notable? I can't find an article on Italian Wikipedia and not much on palazzo del sestiere. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] Comment It has the typical structure of the average bourgeois rental houses of 16th century Venice, but not all of them have a carved balcony...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] Most valuable image of a Venetian 16th century carved balcony would be a good scope; the building is less important. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-06-06 08:44 (UTC)
Scope: Oryx dammah (Scimitar oryx) reintroduced into the wild
Reason: Not sure if this is suitable scope. This species was extinct in the wild then they were reintroduced into protected areas. -- Charlesjsharp (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-06-06 10:25 (UTC)
Scope: Ramphocoris clotbey (Thick-billed lark)
Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 16:40, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 04:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-06 15:48 (UTC)
Scope: Dacia Duster III - left front view
Used in: de:Dacia Duster, uk:Renault Duster
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 04:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-06 15:49 (UTC)
Scope: Renault Rafale - right front view
Used in: de:Renault Rafale, uk:Renault Rafale
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 04:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-06 15:50 (UTC)
Scope: Volkswagen Jetta VI GLI - right front view
Used in: de:VW Jetta VI, en:Volkswagen Jetta (A6)
Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:17, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 04:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Atudu (talk) on 2024-06-07
Scope: Sinthusa nasaka amba (Malayan Narrow Spark) - ventral
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 04:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-06-06 19:16 (UTC)
Scope: Mass grave of 209 Soviet soldiers in Orativ (village)
Used in: Global usage
Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 04:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-06-07 04:25 (UTC)
Scope: St. Simon und Juda church in Trier Stained Glass Window in the church with an image of St Paulul.
Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 04:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-07 05:01 (UTC)
Scope: Madonna col Bambino by Maestro della leggenda di Santa Barbara - Museo Correr.
Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC) Typo con not col. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC) typo correction please Archaeodontosaurus Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] Comment There are no mistakes. Both spellings are the same. Col being the usual contraction of con il. The choice is made by the Museum label. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:51, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-07 05:02 (UTC)
Scope: Tête de sainte Catherine d'Alexandrie (Head of Saint Catherine of Alexandria) - Sebastián de Llanos Valdés - Musée Goya
Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-07 05:05 (UTC)
Scope: Rio dei Giardinetti (Venice) seen from the Ponte dell accademia dei pittori
Support Best in scope --Ercé (talk) 07:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-06-07 05:15 (UTC)
Scope: Chione cancellata (Cross-barred Venus), right valve
Support Useful and used --Ercé (talk) 07:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: grendel\|khan on 2024-06-07 06:59 (UTC)
Scope: Veterans Airport of Southern Illinois
Used in: Veterans Airport of Southern Illinois (Q8021210), en:Veterans Airport of Southern Illinois
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Ercé (talk) on 2024-06-07 07:11 (UTC)
Scope: Lanius isabellinus (museum specimens) (isabelline shrike (phoenicuroides)) eggs
Support Useful and used. --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:15, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-06-07 11:08 (UTC)
Scope: Scolia hirta unifasciata (Scoliid wasp)
Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:20, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Pierre André ^(talk) on 2024-06-07 16:12 (UTC)
Scope: Église Saint-Pierre de Cuinchy, view from Rue Pasteur (Pas-de-Calais)
Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:13, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-06-07 17:22 (UTC)
Scope: Fresco of a detail of the Ascension in glory with saints Reformierte Kirche San Bastian (Zernez)
Used in: Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland.
This is too vague for VI when there are many frescos. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:47, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] Done, description adjusted. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support Thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 06:51, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-06-07 19:56 (UTC)
Scope: Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Novozhyvotiv
Used in: Global usage
Question Were they soldiers or villagers? Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:50, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] soldiers Nikride (talk) 19:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Suntooooth (talk) on 2024-06-07 23:42 (UTC)
Scope: Hyperia (Thorpe Park)
Used in: en:Hyperia (roller coaster)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-06-08 05:12 (UTC)
Scope: Chione cancellata (Cross-barred Venus), left valve
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-08 04:47 (UTC)
Scope: Santa Barbara by Giusto di Alemagna - Museo Correr.
Support Useful & Used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:45, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-08 05:16 (UTC)
Scope: **Valgus hemipterus on Knautia arvensis**
Support Best in scope --Ercé (talk) 06:26, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-08 05:19 (UTC)
Scope: Church of Santa Maria Maddalena - Treviso Italy - View of the nave and choir
Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Atudu (talk) on 2024-06-08
Scope: Pieris naganum (Plain Cabbage) - ventral
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Ercé (talk) on 2024-06-08 06:19 (UTC)
Scope: Emberiza schoeniclus eggs (common reed bunting (witherbyei)) eggs
Support Useful & Used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:46, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Atudu (talk) on 2024-06-08
Scope: Tongeia pseudozuthus (False Tibetan Cupid) - ventral
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Pierre André ^(talk) on 2024-06-08 10:14 (UTC)
Scope: Town hall of Cambrin, view from Boulevard Louis Lesage, (Pas-de-Calais)
Support best in scope. (front)--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-06-08 15:42 (UTC)
Scope: Kaiser-Wilhelm-Brücke (Trier) south side.
Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-06-08 19:49 (UTC)
Scope: World War II memorial in Mervyn
Used in: Global usage
Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-06-09 05:08 (UTC)
Scope: Marmorana serpentina, shell
Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-09 05:07 (UTC)
Scope: Composite Candelabrum 1st century AD - Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice)
Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-09 05:08 (UTC)
Scope: Vierge à l'enfant dite Vierge au gril (Virgin and Child called Virgin of the Grill) - Rodrigo de Holanda - Musée Goya
Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-09 05:14 (UTC)
Scope: Dopo pranzo alla Moncia(After lunch at Moncia) by Apollonio Giovanni - Museo civico Luigi Bailo - Treviso
Support Useful & Used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Pierre André ^(talk) on 2024-06-09 10:50 (UTC)
Scope: Terril n° 73, 18 de Lens, view from Chem. de Loos (Haisnes)
Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: --Thi (talk) 18:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC) on 2024-03-23 18:48 (UTC)[reply]
Scope: Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, head
Used in: en:Bertrand Russell, de, es
Comment This is the most valuable image in scope, but only if the scope does not include the base. If the scope includes the base, we have to consider whether the dark File:Bust of Bernard Russell in Red Lion Square (01).jpg is better than File:I feel I almost know this guy - geograph.org.uk - 1656321.jpg, which is fenced off. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] ~~I opened the most valued review.~~ 1656321.jpg seems to be taken before the restoration. --Thi (talk) 11:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply] Scope changed from Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London to Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, head --Thi (talk) 11:54, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn". Comment too dark. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 04:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: --Thi (talk) 11:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC) on 2024-04-12 11:27 (UTC)[reply]
Scope: Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, head and stand
Comment Ok for the base, but wa can't really see the face. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply] Comment @Thi: - When I search Commons on "Commons:Valued image candidates/Bust Of Bertrand Russell-Red Lion Square-London.jpg/Archive of previous reviews", I see that there was no decision on the original VI nom - just a comment from Ikan expressing concern about Bertrand's head without a stand. In your new image, you appear to have addressed that issue. There probably could be 2 VIs here - one for the head and another for the head + stand. IMHO, suggest you remove the MVR and enter this head + stand image as a new VI nomination with a suitable scope and scope-link. Please add a clear reason in the new VI nom that describes what you are doing and why you think if merits VI. --GRDN711 (talk) 04:12, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] Thanks for the advice. --Thi (talk) 11:51, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] Scope changed from Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London to Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, head and stand --Thi (talk) 11:51, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 04:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-09 16:10 (UTC)
Scope: Škoda Kodiaq II - right front view
Used in: de:Škoda Kodiaq II, de:Škoda Kodiaq, fr:Škoda Kodiaq II
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-09 16:11 (UTC)
Scope: Porsche 972 - right front view
Used in: de:Porsche, de:Porsche Panamera
Support Useful & Used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-09 16:13 (UTC)
Scope: Aston Martin DB12 Volante - right front view
Used in: en:Aston Martin DB12
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Famberhorst (talk) on 2024-06-09 17:28 (UTC)
Scope: *Clitocybe nebularis*
Comment scope is unsuiatable. May be use of English. Fallen leaf is irrelevant. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:12, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] Thank you for your comment. What kind of scope are you proposing?--Famberhorst (talk) 04:28, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] Clitocybe nebularis Charlesjsharp (talk) 06:54, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] Scope adjusted. Thank you for suggestion.--Famberhorst (talk) 09:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-06-09 19:44 (UTC)
Scope: World War II memorial in Koshlany
Used in: Global usage
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Romainbehar (talk) on 2024-06-09 20:11 (UTC)
Scope: Fontaine Bartholdi, fountain sculpted by Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi and erected in Lyon
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-09 22:06 (UTC)
Scope: Pandion haliaetus haliaetus (Osprey)
Comment Must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] Comment What about this image?. But it would be better to have scope of subspecies. Charlesjsharp (talk) 06:57, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] The image you mention is of lower quality. The white is overexposed. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:48, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] Done, thanks El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:49, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-09 22:17 (UTC)
Scope: Bubulcus ibis (Cattle egret)
Comment Must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] Comment Many good images like this one in breeding plumgae. I always check English Wikipedia (but you could check French Wiki which has another of your images) to make sure nominated image is in infobox where appropriate - that's often where you will find VI. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:04, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply] Done, thanks. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:51, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-09 22:24 (UTC)
Scope: *European Bee-eater (Merops apiaster)*
Comment This one is better Merops apiaster 04.jpg --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Atudu (talk) on 2024-06-10
Scope: Euploea doubledayi (Striped Black Crow) - ventral
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-10 05:05 (UTC)
Scope: Head of an athlete inv.244- Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice)
Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-10 05:10 (UTC)
Scope: Kiki de Montparnasse - Bronze - Musée Goya
Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:51, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-10 05:12 (UTC)
Scope: The mysterious sphinx by Charles Van Der Stapenn - Museo d'arte moderna (Venice)
Best in Scope --Thi (talk) 08:51, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-06-10 05:33 (UTC)
Scope: Cochlodina kuesteri, shell
Support Useful and used. --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:56, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-10 11:09 (UTC)
Scope: Ammomanes cinctura (Bar-tailed lark)
Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-10 11:20 (UTC)
Scope: Emberiza sahari (House bunting)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-10 11:30 (UTC)
Scope: Luscinia svecica (Bluethroat)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Pierre André ^(talk) on 2024-06-10 15:49 (UTC)
Scope: Ndebele architecture of Cultural Village (Portals), Botshabelo (South Africa)
Used in: Special:GlobalUsage/Botshabelo_case_Ndebele_of_Cultural_Village.jpgGlobal usage
Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-06-10 16:59 (UTC)
Scope: Detail of the exterior. Cathedral of St. Peter Wooden entrance. (Northside.)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-10 18:17 (UTC)
Scope: BMW Z4 (G29, facelift) M40i - left front view
Used in: ar:بي أم دبليو زد4 (جي29), de:BMW G29, de:BMW CLAR-Plattform, en:List of BMW vehicles, en:BMW Z4 (G29), pl:BMW Z4, uk:Список автомобілів BMW
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-10 18:18 (UTC)
Scope: Škoda Kodiaq II - right rear view
Used in: de:Škoda Kodiaq II, de:Škoda Kodiaq, fr:Škoda Kodiaq II, uk:Škoda Kodiaq
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-10 18:19 (UTC)
Scope: Aston Martin DB12 Volante - right rear view
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-06-10 18:55 (UTC)
Scope: Mass grave of 26 Soviet soldiers in Kalenivka
Used in: Global usage
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-06-11 04:26 (UTC)
Scope: Anomalocardia flexuosa, right valve
Open for review.

Pending Most valued review candidates

Remote view of Florence Duomo by night

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates

This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Commons:Valued image candidates

How to nominate an image for VI status

Adding a new nomination (image)

Renomination

How to open a Most Valued Review

How to review the candidates

How to review an image

Review procedure

Changes in scope during the review period

Contents

Pending valued image candidates

New valued image nominations

Pending Most valued review candidates

Remote view of Florence Duomo by night

Pending valued image set candidates

Navigation menu

Commons:Valued image candidates

How to nominate an image for VI status

Adding a new nomination (image)

Renomination

How to open a Most Valued Review

How to review the candidates

How to review an image

Review procedure

Changes in scope during the review period

Pending valued image candidates

New valued image nominations

Pending Most valued review candidates

Remote view of Florence Duomo by night

Pending valued image set candidates

Navigation menu

Search